The Functionalist and Marxist Views on the Purpose of Socialisation Es

The Functionalist and Marxist Views on the Purpose of Socialisation Functionalists and Marxists go for very similar theories as to the assimilation process. I intend to show this and compare these similarities. There are legion(predicate) well-known functionalists scarce I am mainly focusing on the views of Talcott Parsons and Emile Durkheim in particular. There are many aspects of the socialisation process to cover both concerning functionalist and Marxist views, these include cultures (made up of many different branches), values (peoples beliefs), and norms (patterns of behaviour). Also firsthand and secondary socialisation. Functionalists and Marxists both share similar views on the socialisation process. Both viewpoints are based on the substructure of society this is formed by many external influences as follows the family, media, religion, education and, the state. Both functionalist and Marxists consider that we are the products of social st imuli and are socialised according to our external influences. They both believe in the top-down theory seeing society as a stage with all these influences shaping our individual identities. If society were a stage then we individuals are obviously puppets dancing to the tune of the social structures that shape our identities- indeed our lives (1) Functionalist and Marxists may have similar views but they do not share the same views as to wherefore this process is. I personally believe that in a way we are like puppets, and that we are socialised into what is right and wrong. I believe the biggest influence to be in the family, because the family are concerned with everything that shapes you... ... a move class. To me this is wrong, as lower class seems to be putting one in ones place, lower being the operative word. The media do expose people being the positive side but then when one looks at copycat crimes you cant help but blame the media. A lot o f influence does come in way of the family but this stems back generations and some adapt quicker to change than others. These too have been socialised by their peers and unfortunately can result in these inequalities in society remaining. However if people did not conform to the norms/values that society thrusts upon them, and there were many deviants, this would surely result in anarchy. But so it is, people do conform, and surely enough society roles on as, as both functionalist and Marxists stand for society is more important than the individuals within it(12)